Skip to main content

Home  Radiation Crises Antidote  Regenerative Lifestyles  Current Events  Education  Diseases FAQs  Essential Links  RE Survival  Who We Are   
Cancer Phytopharmacology
Cancer Research
Cancer Resources
Chronic Fatigue
CFIDS Resources
Coagulation Disorder
Digestive Disorders
Ebola and Viruses
Female Health
Heart Disease
Immune Issues
Lyme Disease
Male Health
Mental Conditions
Metal Detox
Neurological Conditions
Respiratory Conditions
Skin Conditions
Weight Problems
Diseases Vanish in a Regenerating Body
(c) 2013-2016 by Dr. John W. Apsley email:

"The fixity of the internal environment is the condition for free life."

--Claude Bernard

Updated more definitively to...


"The cells' internal resilience (energized gel-state) determines freedom from disease."

--John W. Apsley


Do you want to successfully manage a disease, or restore yourself to optimal health and wellbeing?


Can a disease exist in a person who has optimal health and wellbeing? Optimal health and wellbeing arises when our vast majority of body cells are floating in resilient, pristine, high energy fluids.


"The life of the cell is immortal; it is the fluid in which it floats that degenerates."

--Alexis Carrel, Nobel Laureate.


If the vast majority of a person's internal working parts are resilient, is that not what we call optimal health and wellbeing? If you can now think outside the box just a little, then keep reading because the solution offered below may be precisely right for you. 

Our approach is simple - induce internal resilience into the whole person, not treat the disease - exactly as Hippocrates instructed over 2400 years ago. Resilience is the power to recover from injury - it defines at the fundamental level "the natural self-healing tendency of the body." Resilience is expressed by our body cells, tissues and organs by their innate self-healing powers to remove any obstruction that serves as the causation to any disease. Furthermore, resilience is also the ability of cells, tissue and organs to regenerate their structure and function when challenged by internal or external stress. Finally, resilience is perhaps best reflected when cells, tissues and organs recover readily from illness.
“Disease [is] not an entity, but a fluctuating condition of the patient’s body, a battle between the substance of disease and the natural self-healing tendency of the body.”

Regenerating our cells, tissues and organs requires gel-state resilience to be in place. Regeneration is expressed as accelerated and unexpected healing, including healing which otherwise would not occur.
We induce resilience in the whole person as we simultaneously restore The Regeneration EffectTM within by way of the Four Pillars. And we use the Four Pillars as the means to induce The Regeneration Effect within because these Four Pillars have been painstakingly deciphered: 
(A) at the laboratory level through elaborate cell tissue studies, 
(B) in thousands of animal studies, and
(C) in dozens of anthropological / gerontological studies of the long-living.
To bring this approach into clear and credible context, consider the following experiment carried out several decades ago, first by Meryl Rose in the U.S. (1948) and then again later by the Austrian Cancer Research Institute (1962-63):1, 2
An experiment with newts and salamanders was conducted to determine the influence of true regenerative events impacting cancer. Newts and salamanders are well known to regenerate limbs and tails when amputated, something we human beings only "normally" do in limited organs, such as our liver, spleen and bones when the right conditions are present.
These two experiments consisted of either (a) grafting cancer cells directly onto newts' limbs, or (b) painting carcinogens onto the tails of salamanders. In both cases, the researchers were able to bring about a primary cancerous tumor on the limbs or tails. Additionally, after a time, the cancer had spread all over these amphibians' bodies. In such an advanced stage, the amphibians had only a short time left to live.
The investigators then amputated the limbs or tails at or below the primary tumor site. What happened next was astounding. Not only did the limb or tail start to regrow, but the primary tumor site also regressed and completely faded away. Even more startling was the fact that 100% of the metastatic tumors located all over the amphibians' body regressed and completely faded away as well, without being directly treated!
These kinds of experiments have continued and other investigators have determined at least two factors must be involved, namely (1) growth factors and (2) a "triggering" stimulus. We also put forth that growth factors can only maximize their essential effects in a detoxified and fully oxygenated environment. The triggering stimulus is electromagnetic in nature, in other words, select frequencies of energy (precise & unique bioenergies), trigger regeneration in higher animals when used with select growth factors.3, 4, 5 

"Do you remember how electrical currents and 'unseen waves' were laughed at? The knowledge about man is still in its infancy."

-- Albert Einstein


So, under the conditions where true regenerative events were unfolding in a human being (when augmented by the right type of triggering stimulus), The Regeneration EffectTM within would be expected to optimize the natural healthy cell structures and functions of the person. 
And to date, this is exactly what several investigators have confirmed.6, 7, 8
The key to The Regeneration EffectTM regenerating our cells first involves precisely targeting three cellular structures plus their collective expression of electromagnetic energy (i.e., H+ Poising):
1. Detoxifying and restructuring the cellular water;
2. Detoxifying and replenishing the cells' proper mineral content; and
3. Replenishing a special and unique 'splice' of cellular protein that we should have received in abundance from mother's breast milk - specifically a unique proline-rich peptide. It is by no means a coincidence that mother's breast milk is also rich in growth factors.
4. Beefing up harmonic cellular energy.
When these four tasks are completed, cellular, tissue and organ resilience is re-established, and the Four Pillars put the final goal into play - initiating The Regeneration Effect within.
Multiple human studies have shown this approach is effective against the most severe health conditions.8, 9, 10, 11
In fact, related work by top researchers in cell physiology should have revolutionized modern medicine long ago. But despite their many publications spanning over 40 years, the medical world essentially ignored their critical work. And as a result, our present day conventional (disease model) approach to "curing" cancer has defaulted into "controlling" cancer. The final result? Globally we have created the second largest industry and economic force across the world - the cancer control industry - second in size, scope and revenue generation only to the power /energy generating industry.
Fortunately today, with breakthroughs in bioenergetic triggering stimuli,12, 13, 14 anyone can initiate The Regeneration EffectTM within regardless of their current health status by practicing:
(1) Daily Detoxification - emphasizing the use of special, mineral rich, pure water,
(2) Maximal Oxygenation - emphasizing deep breathing exercises while using heat or low impact exercises,
(3) Regenerative Nourishment - emphasizing organic foods, juices and smoothies which contain select embryonic super-nutrients that empower the body's 10 to 75 trillion human cells, and
(4) Psychoneurosomatics (mind-over-matter techniques which resolve deeply entrenched endless stress propagation, emotional traumas and spiritual conflicts).
With the one exception of miraculous healing, the only known tool to date that super facilitates all four pillars are select and precise BioEnergetics (AKA Biofields) driven into the body by way of light, sound, magnetic forces, water, air, heat and electrical currents.15
"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
Nikola Tesla
When properly living a regenerative lifestyle daily (which incorporates select and precise BioEnergetic devices), The Regeneration Effect within fully awakens and drives sequential, precise and continuous regeneration into our cells, leading to an optimized immune system.
Most can implement a regenerative lifestyle right in their own homes very cost-effectively, by learning simple, straight-forward steps. The time required to make a regenerative lifestyle fully integrated into your daily routine is nothing compared to what one gets in return. One hour in the morning, and a couple of hours in the afternoon are all that it takes. And most of the hours required simply involve (a) taking a hot shower or bath while practicing deep breathing, (b) making delicious fresh organic smoothies, and (c) administering select bioenergetic devices as you go about doing your normal daily routine. One can work, play, relax or travel without any fuss.
"In every culture and in every medical tradition before ours, healing was accomplished by moving energy."
Albert Szent-Györgyi (1960)
In this manner, The Regeneration EffectTM within produces a thriving & resilient state within our cells, tissues, organs and entire mind & body.16
Now, for those of you who aren't interested in the hard sciences, you are welcome to stop reading right here. That's all there is to this approach, other than finding a health care provider who can guide you further. And we have made access to such health care providers our top priority for you (see the very end of this section below).
* * * * *
For those of you who are intrigued and have a science background, please read on...
More specifically, The Regeneration EffectTM within empowers the body's 10 to 75 trillion human cells to:
  1. Reboot their natural è healthy è cell cycle programming (i.e., proper cell structure, proper cell replication, proper cell growth, proper cell function including proper cell metabolism and proper: apoptosis, paraptosis, terminal autophagy, necroptosis & autoschizis).
  2. At the genetic level: è (i) restore tumor suppressor gene functions, i.e., p53, p27, p21, è (ii) optimize gene repair via HHR & NHEJ, plus è (iii) protect telomere length of healthy cells and disrupt genetic functions of rogue cells.
  3. Tweak and synchronize cellular energy production via è mitochondrial regeneration via upregulating PGC-1α, and then è maximize mitochondrial function according to the patient's inherited metabolic individuality.
  4. Regenerate è cells è tissues and  è organs from the cell level on up (the only means to heal our human constitution and establish cellular, tissue and organ resilience within our future generations), and excite accelerated repair rates.
  5. Optimize immune function & integrity over the è short and è long term, which may lead to permanent immunity against improper cell growth in the future.


All of the above are implemented by living a step-by-step and straight-forward Regenerative Lifestyle(R)  just like all the long-living cultures have done for centuries.


You see, thriving cells know how to function in balance and they know when its time to make room for their replacement. Implementing the Four Pillars simply helps insure that the next generation of thriving cells can arrive to replace them. In all forms of chronic degenerative disease, the opposite occurs, and deranged cells just keep dysfunctioning and/or multiplying in excess.

More specifically, deranged, degenerating cells almost always feature a dysfunction that makes "false coding" molecules. For one example, in cancer one group of these false coding molecules are called tumor ECTO-NOX proteins (also called tNOX or ENOX2). ECTO-NOX proteins indeed appear to be the best way to diagnose and track the ultimate resolution of cancer through simple blood tests as well as chemotherapeutic treatment failure.16 See: Here.
Unfortunately chemotherapeutic agents may actually worsen the effects of these "false coding" molecules, rendering the cancer many times more aggressive than before!16  So, where does one start???
Accurate Tracking of Resolution + Regeneration = Best Solution
Once The Regeneration Effect takes full hold (as per 1-5 above), the ECTO-NOX proteins simply disappear, and wellness rules over a constitutionally resilient body. So, just what do we mean by The Regeneration EffectTM? First, see Here.
Next, to get a sense about the basics to The Regeneration Effect as it may express in cases of cancer, let's start at the level of the test tube. Watch the short and fascinating 15 minute TED video by Dr. Mina Bissell: Here
In respectful distinction to Dr. Bissell's monumental work in the test tube, our work is based on real patients in real time living and working in modern society. We target the entire body of our patients for regeneration. In this manner (that is by not treating a disease), the body's restored resilience insures disease-free living. You see, only a resilient immune system cures and prevents disease. Only a resilient immune system enables diseased tissues to be replaced with resilient and fully regenerated tissues. This is why direct medical treatment of disease is at best a very distant second in comparison. And when physicians instruct their patients how to maintain this cellular resilience, we enjoy a full, long and happy life. Read more Here.
The mission of modern conventional medicine is to achieve an absence of disease. Our medical system, called Integrative Regenerative Medicine or IRM for short, instructs and manages patients into thriving, fully regenerated states of wellness. IRM embraces that "curing" disease, any disease, must arise from The Regeneration EffectTM within - that is, curing any disease actually arises from the body curing itself of the disease by its Intelligent Design to do so. Read more Here.
As a direct result of practicing the "disease control methods" so prevalent in modern conventional medicine, (1) health care costs sky-rocket, (2) chronic degenerative disease escalate unchecked, and (3) the entire economic system becomes more and more unsustainable.
As a direct result of practicing the Four Pillars to restore and initiate The Regeneration Effect within, (A) health care costs will plummet, (B) the mind and body regenerates, and (C) our collective culture regenerates, thrives and re-establishes ever increasing populations comprised of the wise and long-living.
Select long-living cultures have successfully practiced uninterrupted regenerative lifestyles for thousands of years. Cultures who practice regenerative lifestyles typically (A) have no hospitals, (B) little to no need of physicians, and (C) earn annual incomes of under $1,000 per year.
These thriving cultures rarely, essentially never, contracted cancer or heart disease, or diabetes, or arthritis, or autoimmune disease precisely because they lived a sustainable regenerative lifestyle. In this manner, and in this manner only, do folks thrive over a long lifetime, as opposed to simply survive and doomed to age very prematurely. Read more Here.
Therefore, I and many others are now concluding that only The Regeneration Effect within offers true cures by way of restoring optimal thriving health and resilient immune functions. This is the core reason why approaches such as ours that treat the patient and not the disease are becoming recognized as the wave of the future. See: Here.
With this approach now explained, let us consider the unintended consequences of modern conventional medicine.
According to recent research, conventional chemotherapy has been determined to be only ~2.3% effective. Quite to the contrary, conventional treatments have been discovered to initiate a most serious after-effect. That is, both conventional chemotherapy and radiation therapy unfortunately activate the formation of new, highly invasive and aggressive cancer cells by as much as 30 fold.
The Dismal Benefits of Conventional Chemotherapy
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2004 Dec;16(8):549-60.
The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies.
Abstract: We undertook a literature search for randomised clinical trials reporting a 5-year survival benefit attributable solely to cytotoxic chemotherapy in adult malignancies. The total number of newly diagnosed cancer patients for 22 major adult malignancies was determined from cancer registry data in Australia and from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results data in the USA for 1998. For each malignancy, the absolute number to benefit was the product of (a) the total number of persons with that malignancy; (b) the proportion or subgroup(s) of that malignancy showing a benefit; and (c) the percentage increase in 5-year survival due solely to cytotoxic chemotherapy. The overall contribution was the sum total of the absolute numbers showing a 5-year survival benefit expressed as a percentage of the total number for the 22 malignancies. The overall contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was estimated to be 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the USA.

Conclusion: As the 5-year relative survival rate for cancer in Australia is now over 60%, it is clear that cytotoxic chemotherapy only makes a minor contribution to cancer survival. To justify the continued funding and availability of drugs used in cytotoxic chemotherapy, a rigorous evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and impact on quality of life is urgently required.


The Alarming Unintended Consequences of Conventional Chemotherapy:


Nature Medicine Published online August 5, 2010

Treatment-induced damage to the tumor microenvironment promotes prostate cancer therapy resistance through WNT16B

Sun Y, Campisi J, Higano C, Beer TM, Porter P, Coleman I, True L, Nelson PS.




Acquired resistance to anticancer treatments is a substantial barrier to reducing the morbidity and mortality that is attributable to malignant tumors. Components of tissue microenvironments are recognized to profoundly influence cellular phenotypes, including susceptibilities to toxic insults. Using a genome-wide analysis of transcriptional responses to genotoxic stress induced by cancer therapeutics, we identified a spectrum of secreted proteins derived from the tumor microenvironment that includes the Wnt family member wingless-type MMTV integration site family member 16B (WNT16B). We determined that WNT16B expression is regulated by nuclear factor of κ light polypeptide gene enhancer in B cells 1 (NF-κB) after DNA damage and subsequently signals in a paracrine manner to activate the canonical Wnt program in tumor cells. The expression of WNT16B in the prostate tumor microenvironment attenuated (rendered useless) the effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy in vivo, promoting tumor cell survival and disease progression.These results delineate a mechanism by which genotoxic therapies (chemotherapy) given in a cyclical manner can enhance subsequent treatment resistance through cell nonautonomous effects that are contributed by the tumor microenvironment.


* * *  


The Alarming Unintended Consequences of Conventional Radiation Therapy


"Researchers from the Department of Radiation Oncology at the UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center report that radiation treatment transforms cancer cells into treatment-resistant breast cancer stem cells, even as it kills half of all tumor cells.


“When we look at early-stage cancer patients, we compare patients receiving exactly the same treatment, and some fail and some are cured, and we can't predict who those patients will be,” says Frank Pajonk, MD, PhD, the study's senior author and an associate professor of radiation oncology and Jonsson Cancer Center researcher.


In some cases, cancer stem cells are generated by the therapy, but scientists do not yet understand all the mechanisms that cause this to occur. If they can determine the pathway and remove the reprogramming of cancer cells, they ultimately may be able to reduce the amount of radiation given to patients along with its accompanying side effects, says Dr. Pajonk.


The investigators found that induced breast cancer stem cells (iBCSCs) were generated by radiation-induced activation of the same cellular pathways used to reprogram normal cells into induced pluripotent stem cells in regenerative medicine.


In the study, Dr. Pajonk and colleagues eliminated the smaller pool of BCSCs and then irradiated the remaining breast cancer cells and put them in mice. They were able to observe the initial generation into iBCSCs in response to the radiation treatment through a unique imaging system. These new cells were highly similar to the BCSCs that had been found in tumors that had not been irradiated.They also found that these iBCSCs had a more than 30-fold increased ability to form tumors than the nonirradiated breast cancer cells.


Their findings show that if tumors are challenged by certain stressors that threaten them (such as radiation), they generate iBCSCs that may, along with surviving cancer stem cells, produce more tumors.


The researchers' work continues as they begin to identify the pathways and several classes of drugs to prevent this process from occurring. To date, they have identified 2 different targets and drugs that could prevent it. The group has published their results of the study in breast cancer but also has made similar observations in both glioblastoma and head and neck cancer.


Dr. Pajonk says the study does not discredit radiation therapy. “Patients come to me scared by the idea that radiation generates these cells, but it truly is the safest and most effective therapy there is.'”


Dr. Apsley: I say that we must re-evaluate this fateful downside to conventional treatments so that natural methods can be better understood and adopted. See: Here. But Dr. Pajonk's point of view may be myopic since this is just one of several fateful downsides conventional treatments typically brings about. Keep reading...


The United Kingdom's socialized medical system incorporates many of the identical conventional cancer treatments widely utilized in the United States. A comprehensive long term study brought to light the alarming fact that up to 40% of UK patients die from the medical treatment and not their cancer during the first 30 days. In my opinion, eclectic approaches to treatment will correct this fateful downside.. See: Here


For the record, integrative approaches utilizing biofield therapeutics and/or traditional medicines with proven track records do not suffer from these high-stake risks. For one example:


PLoS One. 2015 Apr 14;10(4):e0124136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124136. eCollection 2015.

Inhibition of cancer cell growth by exposure to a specific time-varying electromagnetic field involves T-type calcium channels.


Electromagnetic field (EMF) exposures affect many biological systems. The reproducibility of these effects is related to the intensity, duration, frequency, and pattern of the EMF. We have shown that exposure to a specific time-varying EMF can inhibit the growth of malignant cells. Thomas-EMF is a low-intensity, frequency-modulated (25-6 Hz) EMF pattern. Daily, 1 h, exposures to Thomas-EMF inhibited the growth of malignant cell lines including B16-BL6, MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, and HeLa cells but did not affect the growth of non-malignant cells. Thomas-EMF also inhibited B16-BL6 cell proliferation in vivo. B16-BL6 cells implanted in syngeneic C57b mice and exposed daily to Thomas-EMF produced smaller tumours than in sham-treated controls. In vitro studies showed that exposure of malignant cells to Thomas-EMF for > 15 min promoted Ca(2+) influx which could be blocked by inhibitors of voltage-gated T-type Ca(2+) channels. Blocking Ca(2+) uptake also blocked Thomas-EMF-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation. Exposure to Thomas-EMF delayed cell cycle progression and altered cyclin expression consistent with the decrease in cell proliferation. Non-malignant cells did not show any EMF-dependent changes in Ca(2+) influx or cell growth. These data confirm that exposure to a specific EMF pattern can affect cellular processes and that exposure to Thomas-EMF may provide a potential anti-cancer therapy.


And for a second example:


"In a series of open label sequential trials 36% of cancer patients with active disease (breast, lung, kidney, ovarian and prostate cancer) reported significant prolongation of life and/or remain alive and 32% reported statistically significant improvement. Nearly all of the patients had received extensive chemo- and radiation therapy, yet the green tea/capsicum only protocol was still of significant benefit." See: Here.


And see: Here and Here.



How to Locate a Health Care Provider trained in Integrated Regenerative Medicine


For more information on where patients may undergo natural methods that induce the Regeneration Effect within, enabling the body to restore optimal health and wellbeing, contact me at 





  1. Rose SM. Epidermal Dedifferentiation During Blastema Formation in Regenerating Limbs of Triturus viridescens. J Exp Zool. 1948;108:337-61; and see: Rose SM. The Role of Nerves in Amphibian Limb Regeneration. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 49:818-33.
  2. Becker RO, Selden, G. The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life. Published by Quill, William Morrow, New York, 1985; pages 217-221.
  3. Yokoyama H. Initiation of Limb Regeneration: the Critical Steps for Regeneration Capacity. Dev Growth Differ. 2008 Jan;50(1):13-22.
  4. Pesce M, Patruno A, Speranza L, Reale M. Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic Field and Wound Healing: Implications of Cytokines as Biological Mediators. Eur Cytokine Netw. 2013 Mar;24(1):1-10.
  5. Saliev T, et al. Therapeutic Potential of Electromagnetic Fields for Tissue Engineering and Wound Healing. Cell Prolif. 2014 Dec;47(6):485-93.
  6. Carley PJ, Wainapel SF. Electrotherapy for Acceleration of Wound Healing: Low Intensity Direct Current. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1985 Jul;66(7):443-6.
  7. Koel G, Houghton PE. Electrostimulation: Current Status, Strength of Evidence Guidelines, and Meta-Analysis. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2014 Feb 1;3(2):118-26.
  8. Nordenström B. An Electrophysiological View of Acupuncture: Role of Capacitive and Closed Circuit Currents and their Clinical Effects in the Treatment of Cancer and Chronic Pain. Am J Acupunct. 1989;17:105-17.
  9. Cope FW. A medical application of the Ling association-induction hypothesis: the high potassium, low sodium diet of the Gerson cancer therapy.   Physiol Chem Phys. 1978;10(5):465-8.
  10. Gerson M. The cure of advanced cancer by diet therapy: a summary of 30 years of clinical experimentation. Physiol Chem Phys. 1978;10(5):449-64.
  11. Cope FW. Successful Therapy of Heart Disease by High Potassium Together with Low Sodium in Accord with Predictions from the Associated Cation, Structured Water Concept of the Cell. Physiol Chem Phys. 1979;11(1):93-4.
  12. Davies PCW, Demetrius L, Tuszynski JA. Cancer as a Dynamical Phase Transition. Theor Biol Med Model. 2011;8:30.
  13. Ciria HMC, et al. Antitumor Effects of Electrochemical Treatment. Chin J Cancer Res. 2013 Apr;25(2):223-34.
  14. Gordon T. Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Axon Regeneration After Peripheral Nerve Injuries in Animal Models and Humans. Neurotherapeutics. 2016 Jan 11.
  15. Guarneri E, King RP. Challenges and Opportunities Faced by Biofield Practitioners in Global Health and Medicine: A White Paper. Glob Adv Health Med. 2015 Nov;4(Suppl):89-96.
  16. Maziarz A, et al. How electromagnetic fields can influence adult stem cells: positive and negative impacts. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016 Apr 18;7(1):54.
  17. Su YC, Lin YH, Zeng ZM, Shao KN, Chueh PJ. Chemotherapeutic agents enhance cell migration and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition through transient up-regulation of tNOX (ENOX2) protein. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Nov;1820(11):1744-52.
  18. Sun Y, Campisi J, Higano C, Beer TM, Porter P, Coleman I, True L, Nelson PS. Treatment-induced damage to the tumor microenvironment promotes prostate cancer therapy resistance through WNT16B. Nat Med. 2012 Sep;18(9):1359-68.
  19.  Lagadec C, Vlashi E, Della Donna L, Dekmezian C, Pajonk F. Radiation-induced reprogramming of breast cancer cells. Stem Cells. 2012;30:833-4.
  20. Printz C. Radiation treatment generates therapy-resistant cancer stem cells from less aggressive breast cancer cells. Cancer. 2012 Jul 1;118(13):3225.
  21. Mort D, et al. For better, for worse? A review of the care of patients who died within 30 days of receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy. The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD). 4-8 Maple Street, London, W1T5HD. 2008. ISBN 978-0-9560882-0-8.
  22. D. M. Morré DM, Morré DJ. Catechin-vanilloid synergies with potential clinical applications in cancer. Rejuvenation Res. 2006;9:45-55.
  23. Flavin DF. A lipoxygenase inhibitor in breast cancer brain metastases. J Neurooncol. 2007 Mar;82(1):91-3.
  24. Pandey M, Gupta S. Green tea and prostate cancer: from bench to clinic. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2009 June 1; 1: 13–25.

Suggested reading:


  1. Nordenström, BEW. Biologically Closed Electric Circuits: Clinical, Experimental and Theoretical Evidence for an Additional Circulatory System. Nordic Medical Publications, (C) 1983 Björn EW Nordenström, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  2. Pollack GH. The Fourth Phase of Water: Beyond Solid, Liquid, and Vapor. Ebner & Sons Publishers, Seattle, WA, 2013.
  3. Gerson C, Walker M. The Gerson Therapy: The Proven Nutritional Program for Cancer and Other Illnesses. Kensington Publishing Corp., NY, NY, 2006.
  4. Water - The Great Mystery: Explore the Power of Consciousness (DVD).